Use case · Redundancy
Vendor diversity
Depending on one RPC vendor is a single point of failure and a single point of pricing. StreamSync makes redundancy structural instead of something you engineer.
The problem
Teams that reach scale usually end up wiring two or three RPC providers together with hand-rolled failover, health checks, and a migration runbook for when one degrades. It works, but it is code you own forever, and pricing power still sits with the vendors.
How StreamSync helps
- Redundancy by construction. Every query is raced to 3–5 independent operators. If one is offline, another has already answered — no failover pool to maintain.
- Competitive pricing. Rates are set by operators competing, not a corporate rate card that changes with a tweet.
- No migration step. Because you were never on a single vendor, an operator disappearing is a non-event, not a weekend.
- Contract-enforced SLA. The 10ms target is enforced by the payment contract across all operators, uniformly.
Getting started
Read why economic decentralization beats geographic distribution, and see how racing delivers redundancy. Compare against Shyft or browse the use cases. Built by Cryptuon.
FAQ
How does StreamSync give me vendor diversity without extra code?
Multiple independent operators run from day one and the gateway races several per query. If one disappears, every other operator is already serving traffic — there is no failover pool to build or migration to run.
What stops a single operator from controlling pricing or access?
Pricing is set by competition across operators, not a corporate rate card, and access is protocol-level. No single party can raise prices, rate-limit query shapes, or change the SLA unilaterally.